Sei (SEI) - Investment Analysis May 2026

Sei (SEI) Investment Analysis: Comprehensive Assessment

Executive Summary

Sei is a Layer 1 blockchain designed specifically for high-performance trading and exchange-oriented applications. The project combines differentiated technology (parallelized EVM, Twin-Turbo consensus, sub-second finality), credible founding team backing, and meaningful user adoption metrics. However, it faces a critical monetization gap: high transaction volume and active user counts have not translated into proportional capital retention or fee generation. The investment case is fundamentally speculative, dependent on whether Sei can convert technical performance into durable economic value while competing against larger, better-capitalized ecosystems.

---

Fundamental Strengths

Clear Technical Differentiation

Sei's core architecture is purpose-built for trading and latency-sensitive applications, distinguishing it from general-purpose Layer 1s. The technical stack includes:

• Parallelized EVM execution enabling concurrent transaction processing
• Twin-Turbo consensus with sub-second finality (approximately 390 milliseconds)
• Optimistic parallelization for efficient block processing
• Theoretical throughput around 12,500 TPS, with roadmap targets significantly higher under the Giga upgrade

This specialization matters because Sei is not attempting to be everything to everyone. Instead, it targets a specific niche: DEXs, perpetuals trading, gaming, and real-time consumer applications where speed and low latency directly improve user experience.

Strong Institutional Backing and Credible Founding Team

The team's pedigree provides meaningful credibility:

• Jeff Feng (Co-Founder): Goldman Sachs TMT investment banking (2017–2020), Coatue Management venture investor (2020–2022), Forbes 30 Under 30, UC Berkeley honors graduate. His background directly supports Sei's institutional positioning and capital markets strategy.

• Jayendra Jog (Co-Founder): Robinhood engineering background, Forbes 30 Under 30. His fintech infrastructure experience aligns precisely with Sei's high-throughput financial infrastructure thesis.

• Supporting leadership: Daniela Osorio (21+ years experience, former ConsenSys/Infura director, NEAR Protocol head of developer ecosystem), Gerald Gallagher (General Counsel, positioned in Washington DC for regulatory engagement), Philip Su (Director of Engineering, founding engineer with AWS/Kubernetes expertise).

Institutional backing includes Multicoin Capital, Jump Crypto, Coinbase Ventures, Circle Ventures, and Delphi Digital. The dual-entity structure (Sei Labs for development, Sei Development Foundation for ecosystem governance) mirrors best practices from established Layer 1 protocols.

Demonstrated User Adoption and Transaction Activity

Adoption metrics show real network usage:

• Daily active addresses: 1.3M to 2M reported across sources, representing substantial growth from 8,300 daily active addresses in early 2024
• Daily transactions: approximately 2 million by 2025, up from 394,000 in early 2024
• Perpetual trading volume: up 19,000% in 2025
• Spot trading volume: approximately $4 billion in Q3 2025
• Lifetime wallets: 85M+ reported by foundation leadership

These figures indicate Sei has achieved real product-market fit in trading-related applications, not merely speculative narrative appeal.

Ecosystem Expansion and Strategic Partnerships

Sei has attracted meaningful institutional and commercial partnerships:

• Binance: confirmed as a Sei Network validator
• Hamilton Lane: launched tokenized SCOPE Fund on Sei
• Ondo Finance: deployed USDY (tokenized U.S. Treasury product) with $71.8M in RWA value at launch
• PayPal PYUSD: integrating via LayerZero cross-chain technology
• Xiaomi: partnership for Web3 wallet distribution
• Stablecoin integrations: native USDC and USDT support
• Institutional infrastructure: Chainlink Data Streams, Ledger support, custody integrations

These partnerships extend beyond speculative trading into payments, real-world assets, and institutional settlement—broadening Sei's potential use cases.

Favorable Valuation Relative to Peers

At a $389M market cap and $578M fully diluted valuation, Sei is priced substantially below dominant Layer 1s. The circulating supply of 6.733B of 10B total tokens (67.3% circulating) means much of the supply is already in the market, reducing future dilution uncertainty compared to heavily locked projects. This valuation structure leaves room for significant upside if adoption and revenue metrics improve.

---

Fundamental Weaknesses

Critical Monetization Gap: Activity Without Economic Capture

The most significant bear argument is that Sei's impressive usage metrics have not translated into proportional economic value capture:

• TVL collapse: TVL peaked above $600M in mid-2025 but collapsed to approximately $47–50M by March 2026—a decline of over 90%
• Protocol revenue: approximately $232 daily in late 2025, negligible relative to Ethereum or Solana
• Volume-to-market-cap ratio: approximately 3.5%, indicating modest trading intensity relative to market capitalization
• Fee sustainability: unclear whether current fee generation can support the token's valuation without relying on ecosystem incentives and emissions

This pattern—high activity but weak capital retention—suggests adoption may be incentive-driven rather than organic. Users and liquidity providers may be participating primarily for ecosystem rewards rather than because Sei offers superior economic value.

Intense Competitive Pressure

Sei operates in one of crypto's most crowded segments, competing against:

The fundamental problem is that technical differentiation alone does not guarantee network effects. Solana already owns the "fast chain" narrative at scale. Sui has demonstrated stronger economic traction. Monad represents an emerging threat with similar technical positioning but stronger narrative momentum. Sei must prove that specialization in trading can overcome these competitive advantages.

Ecosystem Migration and Architecture Risks

Sei's shift toward an EVM-first or EVM-only architecture improves developer accessibility but creates friction:

• Migration complexity: existing Cosmos-native builders may face rebuilding requirements
• Tooling fragmentation: architecture transitions can slow ecosystem momentum
• Developer retention uncertainty: teams may migrate to competing chains during transition periods

The Giga upgrade represents a major technical milestone but also a concentration of execution risk. Delays, bugs, or under-delivery would likely damage sentiment significantly.

Token Economics and Supply Overhang

Several structural concerns exist around token sustainability:

• Large supply overhang: 10 billion total supply with aggressive unlock schedules
• Vesting tail: ecosystem reserve, team, and investor allocations continue unlocking through 2031–2032
• Monthly dilution: approximately 200 million SEI per month entering circulation at certain periods
• Emissions dependency: the network relies heavily on token emissions and ecosystem reserve distribution rather than clear protocol revenue
• FDV-to-market-cap ratio: approximately 1.48x, indicating meaningful supply expansion potential

Even if network usage improves, the market must absorb substantial supply increases. This creates persistent price pressure unless demand growth exceeds supply growth by a significant margin.

Validator Centralization and Technical Complexity

• Limited validator count: only 39–50 active block producers in early phases, far fewer than large proof-of-stake networks
• Quadratic communication costs: Twin-Turbo consensus has scaling limitations that make it difficult to increase validator count without sacrificing performance
• Implementation complexity: parallel execution and specialized trading infrastructure increase development burden and potential attack surface

---

Market Position and Competitive Landscape

Relative Positioning

Sei's competitive advantage rests on specialization rather than scale. The chain is optimized for:

• Order-book style trading
• Low-latency execution
• High-frequency applications
• Gaming and microtransactions
• Real-time consumer interactions

This positioning is strongest when compared against general-purpose chains that are not optimized for trading workloads. However, it is weaker when compared against:

1. Solana, which has already captured the "fast chain" narrative and has deeper ecosystem gravity
2. Sui, which has demonstrated superior economic metrics (higher TVL, better fee generation)
3. Ethereum L2s, which benefit from Ethereum's liquidity and developer base while offering comparable speed

Network Effects Dynamics

Crypto networks exhibit powerful network effects: more users attract more liquidity, which attracts more builders, which attracts more users. Sei must overcome this flywheel with either:

• Superior product-market fit in a specific use case (trading infrastructure)
• Strong incentive-driven growth that converts to organic adoption
• Institutional capital deployment that creates durable liquidity

Current evidence suggests Sei has achieved the first (trading-specific optimization) and partially the second (high activity, though potentially incentive-driven). The third remains unproven.

---

Adoption Metrics: Users, Transactions, and TVL

Active Users and Transaction Volume

The adoption picture is mixed:

Positive signals:

• Daily active addresses grew from 8,300 (early 2024) to 1.3–2M (2025–2026)
• Daily transactions reached approximately 2 million by 2025
• Perpetual trading volume increased 19,000% in 2025
• Spot trading volume approximately $4 billion in Q3 2025

Interpretation concerns:

• High transaction counts can reflect low-value activity, bots, or speculative trading
• Perpetual trading volume growth may indicate leverage and speculation rather than organic adoption
• User retention after incentive cycles end remains unproven

Total Value Locked (TVL)

TVL is the weakest adoption metric:

• Peak: over $600M in mid-2025
• Current: approximately $47–50M (March 2026)
• Decline: over 90% from peak

This collapse is particularly concerning because TVL represents capital that users are willing to lock in the ecosystem. The gap between high transaction volume and low TVL suggests:

1. Incentive-driven activity: users may be participating primarily for ecosystem rewards
2. Capital flight: liquidity providers are not retaining capital on Sei
3. Monetization failure: the chain is not capturing economic value from its activity

What the Data Suggests

High transaction counts with low TVL is a classic pattern in early-stage L1s that fail to sustain adoption momentum after initial speculation. It indicates the chain has achieved user acquisition but not user retention or capital stickiness.

---

Revenue Model and Sustainability

Current Economics

Sei's revenue model is straightforward:

• Transaction fees paid in SEI
• Staking rewards from protocol inflation
• Governance utility from token holding
• Potential ecosystem value capture from application-layer activity

Sustainability Concerns

The critical question is whether fee generation can ever become large enough to support the token's valuation:

• Current fee revenue: approximately $232 daily (late 2025), negligible relative to market cap
• Scaling challenge: even with 2M daily transactions, fees remain low
• Incentive dependency: the network appears to rely heavily on ecosystem reserve distribution and staking rewards rather than organic fee generation
• Monetization uncertainty: if usage remains high but fees remain low, the token may not accrue sufficient value

Long-Term Viability

For Sei to be sustainable long-term, one of the following must occur:

1. Fee generation scales dramatically as usage increases and application-layer value capture improves
2. Staking yields become attractive enough to support token demand independent of price appreciation
3. Ecosystem reserve deployment creates durable value that justifies token allocation

Currently, none of these conditions are clearly met.

---

Team Credibility and Track Record

Strengths

The founding team and leadership bench represent genuine strengths:

• Relevant domain expertise: Feng's Goldman Sachs and Coatue background directly supports institutional positioning; Jog's Robinhood experience aligns with high-throughput financial infrastructure
• External validation: both founders recognized on Forbes 30 Under 30
• Execution capability: the team has shipped major technical milestones (mainnet launch, parallelization rollout, Giga whitepaper)
• Operational depth: recent hires like Daniela Osorio (21+ years, ConsenSys/NEAR background) add meaningful crypto-native experience
• Regulatory engagement: Gerald Gallagher's DC-based General Counsel role signals proactive regulatory strategy
• Research credibility: publication of Sei Giga whitepaper on arXiv demonstrates technical seriousness

Limitations

• Small team size: 11–50 employees at Sei Labs is a concentration risk competing against well-staffed ecosystems
• Limited public technical advisors: no marquee blockchain researchers or former Ethereum core developers are publicly named
• Recent senior hires: key leadership additions occurred in mid-to-late 2025, suggesting the senior bench was still being built
• Execution risk: strong founders do not guarantee durable network effects or successful competitive positioning

Overall Assessment

The team is credible and execution-oriented, but strong founders alone do not guarantee success in a crowded market. The team's ability to retain developers, attract institutional capital, and sustain ecosystem momentum through multiple market cycles remains to be proven.

---

Community Strength and Developer Activity

Evidence of Community Engagement

• Large social following on X and Reddit
• Strong testnet participation historically
• Hundreds of dApps cited in ecosystem materials
• Developer activity described as growing, with smart contract activity doubling in 2025

Quality Concerns

• Incentive-driven participation: high activity may reflect ecosystem rewards rather than organic interest
• Developer retention uncertainty: builders attracted during incentive cycles may not persist if liquidity and users do not
• Narrative dependence: community enthusiasm appears more price-driven than product-driven during bull markets
• Comparison dynamics: community discussions often highlight Sei's smaller scale relative to Solana

Overall Assessment

Community strength appears real but potentially fragile. The ecosystem has attracted meaningful developer and user interest, but the quality of retention—especially after incentive cycles end—remains unproven.

---

Risk Factors

Regulatory Risk

Sei's focus on trading, DeFi, and tokenized assets creates meaningful regulatory exposure:

• Token classification uncertainty: no clear regulatory determination for SEI exists
• Trading/derivatives scrutiny: on-chain orderbook-style activity may face regulatory attention
• Stablecoin and custody sensitivity: USDC/USDT integrations and institutional settlement use cases are sensitive to changing rules
• AML/compliance concerns: high-throughput DeFi infrastructure could attract scrutiny around illicit finance

Technical Risk

• Performance claims must be sustained: any outages, latency issues, or security incidents would directly undermine the core thesis
• Complexity risk: parallel execution and specialized trading infrastructure increase implementation burden
• Bridge/security dependency: cross-chain integrations and institutional workflows introduce additional attack surfaces
• Giga upgrade execution: major technical transitions carry implementation risk

Competitive Risk

• Solana's dominance: Sei must prove specialization beats scale
• Sui's economic traction: Sui has demonstrated superior TVL and fee generation
• Monad's emergence: direct competitor with similar technical positioning but stronger narrative momentum
• Ethereum L2 gravity: Base, Arbitrum, and Optimism can erode Sei's speed advantage while benefiting from Ethereum's liquidity

Market Risk

• High beta to crypto sentiment: mid-cap L1 tokens typically underperform during risk-off environments
• Narrative sensitivity: token value is likely more dependent on market sentiment than mature fundamentals
• Liquidation risk: current derivatives setup shows negative funding and balanced positioning, but extreme fear backdrop could suppress rallies

Token Economics Risk

• Supply dilution: 200M+ SEI per month entering circulation creates persistent sell pressure
• Unlock overhang: vesting extends through 2031–2032, creating multi-year dilution
• Emissions dependency: network relies on token emissions rather than clear protocol revenue

---

Historical Performance Across Market Cycles

Price Performance Summary

Key milestones:

• Launch (April 2023): entered market with strong narrative demand and exchange listings
• Peak (March 2024): reached ATH of $1.075, representing initial speculative enthusiasm
• 1-year high (July 2025): $0.368, showing intermittent recovery attempts
• Current (May 2026): $0.058, representing 94.6% decline from ATH and 73.8% decline from 1-year ago

Cycle Interpretation

Bull market behavior (2023–early 2024):

• Sei demonstrated ability to rally sharply during favorable risk-on conditions
• Strong narrative appeal and exchange listings drove initial adoption
• Token reached premium valuation relative to current metrics

Post-peak behavior (mid-2024 onwards):

• Severe retracement typical of newer L1s that fail to sustain adoption momentum
• Intermittent rallies (July 2025 high of $0.368) suggest some residual narrative appeal
• Overall downtrend despite ecosystem growth indicates market skepticism about monetization

Current cycle posture (May 2026):

• Asset appears to be in recovery/repair phase rather than confirmed uptrend
• Extreme fear backdrop (Fear & Greed Index: 25) creates challenging environment for speculative assets
• Derivatives positioning (negative funding, balanced long/short) suggests market is not crowded on either side

---

Institutional Interest and Major Holder Analysis

Institutional Backing

Sei has attracted attention from credible institutional investors:

• Venture capital: Multicoin Capital, Jump Crypto, Coinbase Ventures, Circle Ventures, Delphi Digital
• Trading firms: GSR, Hudson River Trading (HRT)
• Institutional infrastructure: Binance validator status, Ledger ecosystem support, custody integrations
• Institutional use cases: Hamilton Lane (tokenized SCOPE Fund), Ondo Finance (USDY), PayPal (PYUSD integration)

Interpretation: Institutional awareness is real, but broad institutional capital deployment remains limited. The most defensible conclusion is that Sei has achieved institutional accessibility but not yet institutional conviction.

Major Holder and Supply Risk

• Large allocations: team, investors, ecosystem reserve, and foundation hold substantial portions
• Ongoing unlocks: vesting schedules create persistent supply pressure
• Distribution dynamics: supply concentration and unlock schedules remain important to monitor

The token's float and distribution dynamics create meaningful overhang risk, particularly if ecosystem reserve deployment proves inefficient.

---

Derivatives and Market Structure Analysis

Current Positioning

Open Interest:

• Current: $55.42M
• 30-day high: $72.44M
• 30-day low: $46.59M
• 30-day change: +7.05% (+$3.65M)

Rising open interest indicates increasing participation in derivatives markets, which is neutral-to-bullish on its own. However, the current level remains below the 30-day peak, suggesting leverage has not fully re-extended.

Funding Rates:

• Current: -0.0182% per day (-6.65% annualized)
• 30-day cumulative: -0.1257%
• Positive periods: 13 of 30 days
• Negative periods: 17 of 30 days

Negative funding means shorts are paying longs, reflecting bearish positioning. However, the magnitude is not extreme (below -0.03% threshold for capitulation). This setup can support short-squeeze potential if price stabilizes or turns up.

Long/Short Positioning:

• Current: 51.4% long / 48.6% short
• 30-day average long share: 57.2%
• Trend: shift toward more shorts

Positioning is close to neutral, with traders becoming less aggressively long. This is mildly constructive from a contrarian standpoint—no crowded long trade to unwind.

Liquidations:

• Last 24 hours: $0.00
• 30-day total: $1.81M
• Largest single event: $202.33K

Liquidations have been modest, indicating no immediate forced-position stress or panic deleveraging.

Market Structure Interpretation

The derivatives setup is neutral-to-constructive but not strongly bullish:

Bullish elements:

• Rising open interest shows participation
• Negative funding can support squeeze potential
• Balanced long/short ratio means no crowded trade
• Contained liquidations indicate no panic

Bearish elements:

• Funding is still bearish
• Broader crypto sentiment is Extreme Fear (index: 25)
• OI below 30-day peak suggests leverage has not returned
• No obvious liquidation catalyst

The most likely scenario is that Sei remains a tradable but not strongly trending market. Upside depends on whether spot demand improves while funding remains negative (supporting squeeze potential). Downside risk persists in an Extreme Fear macro backdrop.

---

Bull Case

The bull case for Sei rests on five pillars:

1. Real Technical Differentiation

Sei's parallelized EVM, Twin-Turbo consensus, and sub-second finality represent genuine technical advantages for trading-specific workloads. These are not marketing narratives but implemented features that provide measurable performance benefits.

2. Demonstrated Product-Market Fit

High daily active addresses (1.3–2M), transaction volume (2M daily), and perpetual trading volume growth (19,000% in 2025) indicate Sei has achieved real product-market fit in trading applications. This is not speculative narrative—it is actual user adoption.

3. Ecosystem Expansion and Institutional Partnerships

Partnerships with Binance, Hamilton Lane, Ondo Finance, PayPal, and Xiaomi extend Sei's use cases beyond speculative trading into payments, real-world assets, and institutional settlement. These partnerships create optionality for future adoption.

4. Valuation Asymmetry

At $389M market cap, Sei is priced substantially below dominant Layer 1s. If the network converts technical differentiation into durable adoption and fee generation, the token could re-rate materially from current depressed levels.

5. Giga Upgrade Catalyst

The Giga upgrade promises significant improvements in throughput and developer appeal. Successful delivery could accelerate ecosystem growth and institutional adoption.

---

Bear Case

The bear case is equally compelling:

1. Monetization Gap

High activity (2M daily transactions) has not translated into proportional economic value capture. TVL collapsed from $600M+ to $47–50M. Protocol revenue remains negligible (~$232 daily). This suggests adoption may be incentive-driven rather than organic.

2. Intense Competition

Solana dominates the "fast chain" narrative at scale. Sui has demonstrated superior economic metrics. Monad represents an emerging threat with similar technical positioning. Sei must prove specialization beats scale—a difficult proposition.

3. Token Economics Headwinds

200M+ SEI per month entering circulation creates persistent dilution. Vesting extends through 2031–2032. The network relies on emissions rather than clear protocol revenue. Even if usage improves, token price can remain pressured.

4. Adoption Quality Risk

High transaction counts can reflect low-value activity, bots, or speculative trading. User retention after incentive cycles end is unproven. The gap between activity and TVL suggests capital is not sticky.

5. Execution Risk

Giga upgrade represents a concentration of execution risk. Architecture transitions can slow ecosystem momentum. Developer retention during major upgrades is uncertain.

---

Risk/Reward Assessment

Reward Profile

Potential upside exists if Sei becomes a meaningful venue for trading applications and captures a durable niche. Current valuation leaves room for multiple expansion if adoption and revenue metrics improve. A successful Giga upgrade and sustained developer retention could re-rate the token significantly.

Risk Profile

The token has already suffered a major long-term drawdown (94.6% from ATH). Adoption evidence is incomplete—high activity but weak capital retention. Competitive and execution risks remain high. Token economics create persistent dilution pressure.

Objective Conclusion

Sei presents a high-risk, high-upside profile. The bull case depends on real ecosystem traction in trading-oriented applications and sustained developer adoption. The bear case is that Sei remains a niche L1 with insufficient network effects, weak revenue capture, and continued valuation compression relative to its peak.

On the available data, the risk/reward profile is speculative rather than clearly favorable. Upside exists, but the burden of proof remains on adoption, usage, and durable fee generation. The current derivatives setup (negative funding, balanced positioning, contained liquidations) suggests the market is not crowded on either side, leaving room for both upside and downside moves depending on execution and market sentiment.

---

Key Market Metrics

---

Competitive Landscape

Sei's competitive position is characterized by specialization in a crowded market:

The TVL comparison illustrates Sei's fundamental challenge: despite high transaction volume, the chain has failed to retain capital relative to competitors. This gap between activity and economic value is the core bear argument.

---

Price Performance Analysis

Sei's price trajectory reveals a pattern common to emerging L1s that fail to sustain adoption momentum:

• ATH ($1.075, March 2024): peak of initial speculative enthusiasm
• 1Y High ($0.368, July 2025): intermittent recovery attempt; still 66% below ATH
• Current ($0.058, May 2026): severe drawdown; 94.6% below ATH

This pattern suggests the market has materially de-rated the project, likely due to:

1. Failure to convert activity into economic value
2. Competitive pressure from Solana, Sui, and Aptos
3. Token unlock and dilution concerns
4. Broader crypto market skepticism about emerging L1s

---

Investment Considerations by Risk Profile

Conservative Investors

Sei is not suitable for conservative investors. The asset exhibits:

• High volatility (94.6% drawdown from ATH)
• Unproven monetization model
• Significant execution risk
• Intense competitive pressure
• Token dilution headwinds

Conservative investors should focus on established Layer 1s with proven economic models and larger ecosystems.

Moderate Risk Investors

Sei presents speculative optionality for moderate risk investors willing to underwrite:

• Execution risk on Giga upgrade
• Ecosystem traction in trading applications
• Competitive positioning against Solana/Sui/Aptos
• Token economics and dilution

A small allocation (1–3% of crypto portfolio) could capture upside if Sei converts technical differentiation into durable adoption. However, the burden of proof remains on the team to demonstrate monetization and developer retention.

Aggressive/Speculative Investors

Sei offers meaningful upside potential for aggressive investors who believe:

• Specialization in trading infrastructure can overcome scale disadvantages
• Giga upgrade will accelerate ecosystem growth
• Institutional partnerships will drive adoption
• Current valuation is depressed relative to long-term potential

The derivatives setup (negative funding, balanced positioning) suggests the market is not crowded on either side, leaving room for both upside and downside moves. Aggressive investors should size positions carefully and monitor ecosystem metrics closely.

---

Key Monitoring Metrics

For investors considering Sei, the following metrics warrant close monitoring:

1. TVL trends: recovery above $100M would signal capital retention improvement
2. Daily active addresses: sustained growth above 2M would indicate organic adoption
3. Protocol revenue: movement toward $1M+ daily would demonstrate monetization
4. Developer activity: GitHub commits, smart contract deployments, and ecosystem app count
5. Giga upgrade delivery: timeline and performance improvements
6. Competitive positioning: TVL and user growth relative to Sui, Aptos, and Monad
7. Token unlock schedule: monitor dilution pressure and ecosystem reserve deployment
8. Institutional partnerships: expansion of use cases beyond trading

---

Conclusion

Sei is a technically differentiated Layer 1 blockchain with real user adoption, credible team backing, and meaningful institutional partnerships. However, it faces a critical monetization gap: high transaction volume has not translated into proportional capital retention or fee generation. The investment case depends entirely on whether Sei can convert technical performance into durable economic value while competing against larger, better-capitalized ecosystems.

The risk/reward profile is asymmetric but speculative: meaningful upside exists if Sei becomes a durable trading and institutional settlement chain, but current evidence still shows substantial dilution, competition, and adoption-conversion risk. The token is suitable only for investors willing to underwrite substantial volatility and execution risk in exchange for potential long-term upside.