GAS 가격

A universal ZK verification layer that could make L2 proof verification a lot cheaper - no trusted setup needed

<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>With all the talk about L2 fragmentation this week (Ethereum Economic Zone announcement, Superchain, AggLayer), I wanted to share something I've been working on.</p> <p>The problem in simple terms: every L2 rollup uses its own proof system to settle on Ethereum.<br/> Each one needs its own verifier contract, each costs 200k+ gas, and many require a "trusted setup" - a ceremony where you have to trust that participants deleted their secret keys.</p> <p>GLYPH is a verification layer that takes any proof </p> <p>- regardless of which system generated it<br/> - and verifies it through a single contract for less than 30k gas. </p> <p>No trusted setup. Fully transparent (If the input proof is - *limitation*).</p> <p>Why this matters:</p> <p>- Gas savings: ~7.5x cheaper than Groth16 (the current most common verifier)</p> <p>- Universality: supports all major proof systems<br/> (Groth16, STARK, Plonk, Halo2, Nova, SP1, Binius, and more)</p> <p>- Transparency: no trusted setup ceremony needed - everything is publicly verifiable</p> <p>- Interop: different rollups using different proof systems can all settle through the same verifier</p> <p>The code, paper, and formal soundness proofs are all open source under MIT license.<br/> Tested on Ethereum testnets with reproducible benchmarks, no synthetic numbers.</p> <p>Paper: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18792566">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18792566</a></p> <p>GitHub Repo: <a href="https://github.com/Christopher-Schulze/glyph-zk">https://github.com/Christopher-Schulze/glyph-zk</a></p> <p>I would love to hear your feedback on this.</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/crobin0"> /u/crobin0 </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/1s8n2du/a_universal_zk_verification_layer_that_could_make/">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/1s8n2du/a_universal_zk_verification_layer_that_could_make/">[comments]</a></span>