Infini Hacker Launders 15,470 ETH in Shocking Tornado Cash Move, Exposing DeFi’s Fragile Defenses

BitcoinWorld

Infini Hacker Launders 15,470 ETH in Shocking Tornado Cash Move, Exposing DeFi’s Fragile Defenses

In a stark reminder of the persistent vulnerabilities within decentralized finance, the perpetrator behind the 2023 Infini stablecoin heist has executed a major laundering operation, funneling 15,470 ETH—valued at approximately $32.58 million—into the privacy mixer Tornado Cash. This alarming development, first reported by blockchain analytics firm AmberCN, underscores the sophisticated, multi-stage financial strategies employed by modern crypto criminals and highlights the ongoing cat-and-mouse game between hackers and blockchain forensic experts. The Infini hacker’s latest move not only capitalizes on recent market volatility but also demonstrates a chilling proficiency in obfuscating the trail of stolen digital assets.

Infini Hacker Executes Complex Laundering Strategy

The recent transaction represents a critical phase in a long-running financial saga. According to detailed on-chain analysis, the attacker initiated this laundering phase by strategically purchasing 6,316 ETH with DAI stablecoins precisely when the Ethereum price dipped to $2,109. This tactical buy, occurring just seven hours before the main laundering event, suggests a deliberate attempt to maximize value or restructure holdings before obfuscation. Subsequently, the hacker deposited the entire consolidated sum of 15,470 ETH into Tornado Cash, a protocol designed to break the on-chain link between sender and recipient addresses.

This activity is directly connected to the original February 2023 exploit of Infini, a stablecoin-focused neobank project. During that incident, the attacker successfully stole $49.5 million in USDC. Forensic timelines show the hacker then swapped 3,540 ETH for DAI at an average price of $3,762 in August 2023, indicating a period of asset holding and market watching. The latest laundering of 15,470 ETH, therefore, appears to be the culmination of a patient, year-long strategy to liquidate and conceal the proceeds from the initial theft.

The Mechanics of On-Chain Money Laundering

Understanding this event requires a grasp of how crypto laundering operates. Unlike traditional finance, every transaction is recorded on a public ledger, but tools like mixers complicate tracing. The process often involves:

• Consolidation: Gathering funds from multiple wallets into fewer addresses.
• Asset Swapping: Converting stolen stablecoins (like USDC) into volatile assets (like ETH) across decentralized exchanges.
• Timing the Market: Executing trades during price dips to acquire more volume of the target asset.
• Obfuscation: Using privacy protocols like Tornado Cash to sever the transparent blockchain trail.

Tornado Cash and the Eternal Privacy Debate

The choice of Tornado Cash is particularly significant. Despite being sanctioned by the U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) in August 2022, the open-source, decentralized nature of the protocol means it continues to operate. It functions as a non-custodial privacy solution, allowing users to deposit ETH or other supported assets and later withdraw them to a fresh address, making it extremely difficult to connect the deposit and withdrawal transactions. This case powerfully illustrates the regulatory and enforcement challenges posed by decentralized technology, where code operates autonomously across a global network.

Consequently, blockchain analytics firms have become essential. They use advanced clustering algorithms, pattern recognition, and cross-referencing with known exchange addresses to attempt to de-anonymize these flows. The initial report by AmberCN itself is a product of this surveillance ecosystem. However, as this Infini hacker case shows, determined actors with sufficient technical knowledge can still navigate these obstacles, leveraging market conditions and privacy tools to their advantage.

Historical Context and Impact on DeFi Security

The Infini exploit did not occur in a vacuum. It was part of a devastating year for DeFi, with over $3.8 billion lost to hacks and scams in 2023 according to industry reports. This specific attack targeted a “stablecoin neobank,” a hybrid model aiming to offer banking services using crypto-backed stablecoins. The breach likely involved a smart contract vulnerability or a private key compromise, common vectors in such incidents. The prolonged period between the theft and the major laundering event is also telling. It suggests hackers are increasingly adopting long-term strategies, waiting for scrutiny to fade and for optimal market conditions before moving large sums, thereby reducing the immediate effectiveness of freeze orders on centralized exchanges.

The Ripple Effects and Industry Response

Such high-profile laundering events have immediate and long-term consequences. Firstly, they erode institutional and user confidence in the security of DeFi protocols. Secondly, they intensify calls for stricter regulation of privacy-enhancing technologies, potentially threatening legitimate user privacy. Thirdly, they drive innovation in forensic analytics and compliance tools for crypto businesses. Exchanges and custodians must now employ even more rigorous Know-Your-Transaction (KYT) checks to identify and block funds originating from mixers linked to sanctioned addresses or major thefts.

The table below outlines the key phases of the Infini hacker’s activity based on available on-chain data:

Date	Action	Amount	Estimated Value (at time)
Feb 2023	Initial exploit of Infini project	$49.5M USDC stolen	$49.5 million
Aug 2023	Asset swap (ETH to DAI)	3,540 ETH swapped	~$13.3 million (at ~$3,762/ETH)
Recent (2025)	Strategic DAI to ETH purchase	6,316 ETH bought	~$13.3 million (at ~$2,109/ETH)
Recent (2025)	Laundering via Tornado Cash	15,470 ETH deposited	$32.58 million

Conclusion

The case of the Infini hacker laundering 15,470 ETH through Tornado Cash is a multifaceted lesson in crypto crime, market strategy, and regulatory limitation. It demonstrates that despite advancements in blockchain forensics and global sanctions, determined bad actors can still execute complex, high-value laundering schemes with patience and technical know-how. This event reinforces the critical need for robust, audited smart contract security, proactive monitoring by projects, and continued dialogue on balancing privacy with transparency in the decentralized ecosystem. As the digital asset space evolves, so too must its defenses, making the work of analysts and the vigilance of the community more crucial than ever.

FAQs

Q1: What is Tornado Cash and why do hackers use it?
Tornado Cash is a decentralized, non-custodial privacy protocol on Ethereum. Hackers use it to break the transparent link on the blockchain between the address that received stolen funds and the address that eventually spends them, making the funds extremely difficult to trace and seize.

Q2: How was the Infini hacker able to launder the ETH so long after the theft?
The hacker employed a patient strategy, holding assets for over a year. This waiting period allows initial investigative focus to fade and lets the attacker identify optimal market conditions (like a price dip) to maximize value or restructure assets before the final obfuscation step.

Q3: Can the laundered 15,470 ETH be recovered?
Recovery is very challenging once funds enter a mixer like Tornado Cash. While blockchain analysts may attempt to track subsequent withdrawals, the primary recourse relies on exchanges and services identifying and freezing any funds that are linked to the sanctioned mixer addresses when the hacker tries to cash out into traditional currency.

Q4: What does this mean for ordinary crypto users’ privacy?
High-profile laundering cases increase regulatory pressure on all privacy tools. This can lead to broader surveillance of blockchain transactions, potentially impacting the financial privacy of legitimate users who are not engaging in illicit activity.

Q5: What can DeFi projects learn from the Infini hack?
Projects must prioritize rigorous smart contract audits, implement robust protocol monitoring for unusual activity, and have clear incident response plans, including communication with forensic firms and law enforcement. The extended timeline of this attack also shows the need for long-term vigilance even after an initial exploit.

This post Infini Hacker Launders 15,470 ETH in Shocking Tornado Cash Move, Exposing DeFi’s Fragile Defenses first appeared on BitcoinWorld.