Deutsch한국어日本語中文EspañolFrançaisՀայերենNederlandsРусскийItalianoPortuguêsTürkçePortfolio TrackerSwapCryptocurrenciesPricingIntegrationsNewsEarnBlogNFTWidgetsDeFi Portfolio TrackerOpen API24h ReportPress KitAPI Docs

Chainlink Ambassador: ‘XRPL Is a Ghost Chain and XRP Is a Bank-Themed Memecoin’ – Pundit Fact Checks

4h ago
bullish:

0

bearish:

0

img
  • Chainlink advocate labels XRPL ghost chain as pundit disputes claims
  • Fact check highlights XRPL tokenization data contradicting ghost chain narrative
  • Analyst points to stablecoin activity and asset tokenization on XRPL

Crypto commentator Zach Rynes published a post on X criticizing the XRP ecosystem and questioning the role of the XRP Ledger within the broader blockchain infrastructure landscape. In his post, Rynes described the XRP Ledger as a “ghost chain” and characterized XRP as a “bank-themed memecoin” rather than a core infrastructure asset supporting institutional blockchain adoption.


According to Rynes, the economic structure surrounding Ripple and XRP places token holders in a weaker position because the company prioritizes the interests of its equity shareholders when allocating revenue and corporate resources.


He explained that projects issuing both equity and tokens often create separate stakeholder groups whose economic incentives may not always align, since shareholders typically possess enforceable legal rights to company profits while token holders rely primarily on market demand.


Moreover, Rynes argued that Ripple historically raised funds through XRP sales while also securing venture capital financing and expanding corporate operations through acquisitions and technology development initiatives.


Consequently, he stated that XRP holders do not receive direct economic exposure to Ripple’s corporate growth, even though token sales helped finance company expansion.


Pundit Fact Check Challenges Claims That XRPL Is a Ghost Chain

However, a fact check shared by crypto commentator Diana examined several of the statements made by Rynes using publicly available blockchain data and tokenization metrics. The analysis directly addressed the claim that the XRP Ledger operates as a ghost chain lacking measurable adoption.


Data cited in the review shows that the XRP Ledger currently represents about $1.42 billion in tokenized asset value while also supporting roughly $404 million in stablecoin market capitalization across the network. Additionally, the same dataset indicates that XRPL hosts around $1.14 billion in tokenized commodities, a figure that places the network second behind Ethereum within that segment of the tokenized asset market.


Bridge Currency Role and XRPL Adoption Metrics

Diana also examined Rynes’ statement suggesting that XRP’s bridge currency role has become obsolete. The XRP Ledger continues supporting auto bridging within its decentralized exchange architecture, allowing XRP to function as an intermediary asset whenever that route provides the most efficient trading path between digital assets.



The commentator also reviewed claims regarding XRPL’s share of the tokenized real-world asset market. Global represented asset value stands near $346.78 billion, while XRPL accounts for about $1.42 billion of that total. Diana noted that a smaller market share does not indicate the absence of adoption, particularly when the network ranks among the leading platforms in tokenized commodities.


Stablecoin Activity and RLUSD Distribution

Furthermore, Diana addressed claims that the XRP Ledger lacks meaningful stablecoin activity. Data cited in the analysis shows the network hosts roughly $404 million in stablecoin market capitalization and records close to $904 million in stablecoin transfer volume within 30 days, indicating measurable payment and settlement activity.


She also examined statements suggesting that Ripple does not rely on XRPL for its RLUSD stablecoin. According to her, current data shows that about 79.71% of RLUSD circulates on Ethereum while roughly 20.29% exists on the XRP Ledger. The analyst explains that this distribution reflects rollout strategy and exchange support rather than abandonment of XRPL.


Network Ranking and Ownership Structure Clarified

Diana went on to further address statements suggesting XRPL fails to rank among the top blockchain networks by usage. The dataset referenced in the criticism lists 33 networks rather than 40, indicating that claims about XRPL missing a top 40 ranking rely on inaccurate framing.


Finally, Diana emphasized that the criticism often centers on the distinction between Ripple equity and XRP ownership. Ripple shares represent corporate ownership in the company, while XRP functions as a digital asset operating within the XRP Ledger network rather than a claim on Ripple’s corporate profits.


Also Read: XRP Surges Toward $90B Market Cap as Ripple Quietly Expands Worldwide


The post Chainlink Ambassador: ‘XRPL Is a Ghost Chain and XRP Is a Bank-Themed Memecoin’ – Pundit Fact Checks appeared first on 36Crypto.

4h ago
bullish:

0

bearish:

0

Manage all your crypto, NFT and DeFi from one place

Securely connect the portfolio you’re using to start.