Bitcoin: Saylor and Back View the BIP-110 Proposal as More Dangerous Than the “Spam” It Targets

The debate around the evolution of the Bitcoin network is experiencing a new episode with the BIP-110 proposal, designed to limit non-monetary transactions and certain data considered undesirable. While its defenders believe it would protect the initial use of the protocol, several influential figures dispute this approach. Michael Saylor and Adam Back believe such a modification could create more risks than it solves. Their positions thus revive an important discussion on the balance between network protection, decentralization, and protocol stability.

L’article Bitcoin: Saylor and Back View the BIP-110 Proposal as More Dangerous Than the “Spam” It Targets est apparu en premier sur Cointribune.