0
0
A former City of London banker known online as Lord Belgrave has sparked intense debate within the XRP community after suggesting that Rippleās escrowed XRP supply may have been conceptually pre-allocated to central banks and major global institutions long before public adoption discussions began.
In a detailed social media post, Belgrave claimed that Rippleās escrow was never designed as a pool of tokens waiting to be sold into the open market, but rather as a strategically engineered liquidity mechanism aligned with long-term institutional readiness.
According to Belgrave, Rippleās escrow structureādefined by locked supply, deterministic release schedules, and multi-year horizonsāwas framed internally as committed future liquidity, not discretionary corporate inventory.
He stated that, in discussions he witnessed over several years, escrowed XRP was treated as if a significant portion had already been accounted for in future system deployments.Ā While not publicly assigned or disclosed, the supply was allegedly regarded as conceptually reserved for large-scale financial infrastructure use.
Belgrave further claimed that these discussions extended well beyond the United States and included institutions across Europe, the Middle East, and Asia.
He referenced central banks, systemically important financial institutions, and multilateral bodies such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), not as marketing partners, but in the context of global settlement architecture.
Also Read: Nothing Is 100% Safe, Says ETF Expert as Bitcoin Quantum Fears Shake Crypto Today
Nobody is supposed to know this. But as promised, I am sharing this with you.
And I need to be precise in how I say it.
From what I witnessed over the years, Rippleās escrow was never intended to represent loose corporate ownership waiting to be sold into the market.
It wasā¦
ā Lord Belgrave (@LordBelgrave) December 19, 2025
He emphasized that these conversations were governed by strict non-disclosure agreements (NDAs), suggesting that public visibility was deliberately limited during the systemās preparation phase.
According to Belgrave, recent developments may indicate that this long-standing silence is beginning to lift. He pointed to Rippleās regulatory progress, including its OCC bank charter approval, and a noticeable shift in institutional language that increasingly mirrors Rippleās long-established framework.
In his view, when a system transitions from preparation to deployment, ambiguity fades. NDAs begin to loosen, and what was once quietly reserved becomes operational.
Adding nuance to the discussion, software engineer Vincent Van Code responded to Belgraveās claims, agreeing that a large number of NDAs exist but disputing the idea that they simply āexpire.ā According to Van Code, NDAs typically remain in force until both parties mutually agree in writing to disclose confidential information.
He explained that such agreements are largely designed to keep counterparties out of regulatory scrutiny until compliance requirements, audits, and legal frameworks are fully completed.
Van Code suggested that disclosure would more likely occur through coordinated agreement rather than automatic expiration, reinforcing the idea that regulatory readiness, not secrecy alone, has dictated the pace of public acknowledgment.
While the claims have reignited speculation about XRPās long-term role in global finance, it is important to note that neither Ripple nor any central bank or international institution has publicly confirmed that escrowed XRP has been pre-allocated in the manner described. Belgrave himself stressed that he was sharing how escrow was framed internally, not asserting documented proof of finalized allocations.
As XRP continues to attract attention for its potential role in cross-border settlement and financial infrastructure, discussions around escrow, liquidity, and institutional readiness are likely to intensify.
Whether these claims reflect behind-the-scenes reality or informed speculation remains unresolved, but they highlight growing anticipation that XRPās next phase may involve far more than speculative trading. For now, the assertions remain unverified, offering a provocative lens into how some insiders believe Rippleās long-term strategy was designed to unfold.
Also Read: Unknown 95,000,000 XRP Amid Price Uptick Raises Alarm ā Whatās Happening?
The post XRP Escrow Already Pre-Allocated to Central Banks and Global Institutions? Ex-London Banker Reveals appeared first on 36Crypto.
0
0
Manage all your crypto, NFT and DeFi from one placeSecurely connect the portfolio youāre using to start.
0
0
0
0
0
0
