The Road of Trials: Building the Most Advanced DYOR System

The Real Challenge: Creating an AI That Thinks Like a Researcher

By the end of Article 5, we had crossed a line we couldn’t uncross. We made the decision to build DYOR AI. But as we previously revealed, this wasn’t about following a trend — it was about solving a deeper problem that had been building long before “AI agents” became the latest narrative.

We weren’t building a tool to automate output.
We were attempting to create an AI that can think like a researcher.

That’s not a small leap. Because thinking like a researcher means more than just processing data. It’s knowing what matters, when it matters, why it matters — and understanding how those truths evolve across time, context, and intention. It means judgment. Pattern recognition. Skepticism. A mental model that works like a conditional statement: if… else… but one that remembers, questions, and resists bias.

This was our real challenge:
Not replacing human insight — but learning how to structure it, encode it, and scale it with precision.

DYOR AI had to learn how to form a conclusion, not simply report inputs. And to do that, it had to first observe how the best human researchers form theirs.

So we went back to the source.

Gathering the Knowledgebase: A Library of Web3 Truths

As explained in earlier chapters, Trust Army was never a gimmick. It wasn’t a bounty board. It was our testbed for methodology. Each of its tasks (only 4 of 12 released in beta) was designed to teach users how to extract, verify, and evaluate project data with rigor and logic.

Later, Hacken’s Alpha Intelligence subcommunity emerged from its top performers. What they produced wasn’t surface-level content. These were analytical judgments — flagging flawed tokenomics, identifying red flags in governance models, even exposing undeclared founder affiliations.

That’s when we realized:
This wasn’t a dataset. It was a growing body of crypto truth.

And we weren’t archiving it. We were designing a system to keep it alive.

From that need, the DYOR scheme was born — a complete, layered map of crypto research logic. Every data type, from immutable facts to real-time signals, had its own update rules, validation logic, and risk tolerance:

• Token vesting schedules — updated monthly or after unlocks.
• KOL sentiment — monitored in real-time, with spike detection.
• Audit status and bug bounty disclosures — tracked post-publication.
• GitHub development — parsed every 48 hours using commit metrics.

There are nearly 10,000 listed projects on CoinMarketCap today. Most will never matter — but new ones appear every day. Each has dozens of metrics, each on its own clock.

That’s why DYOR AI isn’t a luxury.
It’s the only way to scale this library.

No human analyst, no matter how passionate, can monitor that much data. Not even across a global, 24/7 network.

The 12 Research Tasks: Training the Future of AI-Powered Due Diligence

Our researchers weren’t hired to farm bounties. Trust Army wasn’t built to measure speed. It was built to measure depth of thought.

Each of the 12 research tasks was carefully crafted not just to gather information, but to map human logic — decision-making in motion.

We didn’t ask people to extract facts.
We asked them to weigh evidence.

• Why is this project suspicious?
• What subtle indicator triggered concern?
• How were contradicting data points reconciled?
• What deserves inclusion in a final verdict — and what doesn’t?

Even during the 4-task beta, a clear signal emerged:
The best researchers weren’t compiling — they were reasoning.

And that, more than anything, became the architecture for AI training. Not checklists, but decision trees. Not summaries, but rationales.

Each approved report — reviewed by validators and Alpha leads — became a labeled dataset for teaching context-aware models to force AI to form questions:

• “Is this vesting logic typical for projects at this stage?”
• “Does this founder’s online behavior raise new risk factors?”
• “How does stated TVL compare to verified wallet patterns?”

These tasks weren’t tutorials.
They were templates for trust.

The DYOR Certification: Making Research a Recognized Skill

If AI was to learn from real researchers, we had to ensure those researchers had credibility. Not assumed. Proven.

That’s why we introduced DYOR Certification.

This isn’t resume filler. It’s a logic passport.
It links your work, your conclusions, your methodology — to your reputation. Via a soulbound identity layer.

What does it validate?

• Consistently low error rate
• Pattern-aware thinking
• Objective judgment

Why does this matter?
Because AI won’t learn from randomness. It will learn from structure.
Certified researchers are more than users — they’re signal filters.
They anchor the machine’s learning loop.

• First: human insights
• Then: AI reflects, enhances, or challenges
• After: updated facts shift conclusions
• Finally: feedback re-enters the system

This isn’t annotation.
This is human ethos, encoded.

The Unexpected Allies: The First True Believers in Our Vision

We hadn’t even launched the full Trust Army yet. DYOR AI was still forming as a concept. But suddenly — people came knocking.

Project founders. Wallets. DeFi teams. AI Trading platforms.
They didn’t want partnerships or promo.

They wanted integration.

They wanted DYOR.

Even without a full release, they saw it:
DYOR isn’t a dashboard — it’s a standard.

And as demand grew, we realized the shift:

DYOR AI won’t be only where users go.
It should be built into where they already are.

Wallets. Browsers. On-chain risk monitors. Trading bots.
The DYOR AI concept is becoming a layer, not a destination.

We’re not building one more tool.
We’re architecting the infrastructure of credibility in Web3.

And before this AI learns to form its own conclusions, we’re teaching it how to inherit ours — truthfully, transparently, and together.

👉 Follow us | Join the discussion | Get insights on Discord