🚨 JUST IN: Crypto AI Agent is here!!! Watch the video 🎥

EnglishDeutsch한국어日本語EspañolFrançaisՀայերենNederlandsРусскийItalianoPortuguêsTürkçe投资组合跟踪工具掉期交易加密货币定价开放API集成新闻赚取博客NFT小工具DeFi投资组合跟踪器加密货币游戏24小时报告新闻资料包API文档
CoinStats

The Coldest Crypto Winter Ever? Bloomberg Analyst Theory Fuels a Heated Debate

4时 之前
看涨:

0

看跌:

0

img

Bitcoin trades near $67,200 after falling 47% from its $126,000 all-time high, and Bloomberg’s Joe Weisenthal argues this is the coldest crypto winter ever, igniting a heated debate across the industry.

We break down his thesis, the strongest counterarguments, and what both sides reveal about the current crypto market.

Why Weisenthal Calls This the Coldest Crypto Winter

A crypto winter is a prolonged downturn marked by falling prices, faded retail interest, and shrinking venture funding. Joe Weisenthal, co-host of Bloomberg’s Odd Lots podcast, says this one stands out for its psychological and structural pain.

In his recent newsletter, Weisenthal expanded his February list to 12 reasons why this period qualifies as the coldest crypto winter ever. Many original points still apply, now compounded by fresh structural pressures across global markets.

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens

The drawdown is happening amid renewed US Dollar strength, which typically pressures risk assets. Crypto long promoted as a fiat hedge faces direct headwinds when investors fear weakness in alternatives to the dollar.

The “it’s still early” narrative has lost much of its persuasive power. Spot ETFs delivered institutional adoption, regulation improved, and the setup became about as favorable as it gets, leaving fewer remaining bullish catalysts.

Crypto Twitter has gone unusually quiet. Bitcoin carries reputational associations tied to recently released documents, while quantum computing risks loom as a longer-term threat to the network’s core security model.

The AI boom is another major factor. It crowds out electricity for miners and absorbs the mental market share crypto once held among talented founders, engineers, and the most ambitious career-focused professionals.

Opportunity costs are acute. Tech and semiconductor stocks deliver strong returns while crypto languishes. Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy), even trimmed positions recently, signaling potential softening among previously steadfast corporate accumulators.

Performance is also concentrated in a few names. Privacy-focused Zcash has held up well, while broader blockchain transparency now enables sophisticated tracking, weakening the original narrative of fully uncensorable private finance.

How Industry Experts Are Pushing Back

The thesis has drawn strong pushback. Austin Campbell, founder of Zero In and a former executive at Paxos and JPMorgan, argued that many blockchain gains may prove diffuse for consumers or end up captured by traditional finance.

“I would also add that it’s increasingly apparent that many of the gains from blockchain technology will either be diffuse gains to consumers (hard to invest in that) or captured by actual financial companies with, you know, stocks (e.g. HOOD), not tokens,” Campbell said on X.

Vassilis Tziokas offered a sharper critique. He called the “crypto winter” framing overly vague, arguing it conflates token prices with technology adoption, developer inflows, venture capital activity, and broader retail participation across the global market.

In his view, several of Weisenthal’s points are inaccurate, partially true but actually positive signals of maturity, or simply macroeconomic arguments not unique to crypto. He sees the sector progressing despite past excesses.

Bill Hughes, a lawyer at Consensys, offered the most dismissive take. He noted that similar dire predictions tend to surface every four years, highlighting just how cyclical and repetitive crypto sentiment has become across cycles.

The critics share a common point. They argue that Weisenthal mixes valid macro pressures with structural claims that overlook ongoing technological maturity, real stablecoin adoption, and the steady infrastructure built across both bull and bear cycles.

“And yet Ripple is still worth US$123 billion, which would make it the 14th largest listed company in the EU, ahead of behemoths like Airbus and Deutsche Telekom. $DOG Eis worth US$15 billion and its a joke coin about a dog,” BitMEX Research Replied.

What the Market Context Really Shows

The 2018 comparison feels different now. Back then, broader markets were subdued, while today AI and tech sectors deliver outsized returns. That divergence intensifies the psychological sting for crypto investors watching wealth created elsewhere.

Talent inflows into crypto have slowed sharply. AI opportunities dominate career pipelines, capital allocation, and developer attention, draining one of the historical engines that fuels every credible technology cycle in the long run.

Stablecoins and traditional finance infrastructure are also quietly absorbing blockchain benefits. They capture much of the speed and programmability without the same token upside, potentially limiting speculative appeal for retail investors.

For the industry, the winter has already brought job cuts, lower venture funding, and muted retail enthusiasm. Supporters argue bear markets clear weak hands, while critics emphasize maturing adoption curves and competition from other technologies.

Weisenthal presents the challenges candidly without calling a bottom. The mix of macro pressure, resource competition, opportunity costs, and eroding uniqueness creates a notably harsh environment for both believers and skeptics.

As participants search for fresh catalysts, including macro easing, policy shifts, or AI and crypto convergence, the debate keeps going. With Bitcoin hovering near $67,200, the chill is undeniable, yet cyclical history suggests an eventual thaw could still arrive.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights 

4时 之前
看涨:

0

看跌:

0

从同一位置管理所有加密资产、NFT 和 DeFi 资产

安全地关联您正在使用的投资组合,以开始交易。