iPad design app Procreate declares it will never use generative AI: Can the company survive?
0
0
Procreate, the acclaimed iPad design application, has taken a daring stance by rejecting the use of generative AI in its products.
At a time when many tech companies are racing to integrate AI to stay competitive, Procreate’s CEO, James Cuda, has firmly committed to preserving human creativity as the core of their platform.
This bold decision raises questions about the company’s future and its ability to navigate the evolving tech landscape.
Creativity is ‘made, not generated’
Procreate has made headlines with its declaration that it will not incorporate generative AI into its design tools.
In a statement posted on the company’s website, Procreate acknowledges the advancements and utility of machine learning and generative AI but insists that these technologies fundamentally clash with the platform’s commitment to fostering human creativity.
According to Procreate, the essence of their product is to enable human expression, which they believe cannot be authentically replicated by AI.
James Cuda’s firm stance was further underscored in a recent video posted on X, where he explicitly stated that Procreate is built to support creativity that is “made, not generated.”
This position has sparked significant discussion on social media, with many artists voicing their support for Procreate’s approach.
However, the sustainability of this stance remains uncertain.
Past controversies in the creative industry
Procreate’s decision echoes past controversies in the creative industry regarding technological innovations that some argue undermine human artistry.
For example, in 2022, Clip Studio Paint faced backlash after introducing an image generator tool, leading to a reversal of the feature.
Similarly, Adobe has encountered criticism over its AI features, with concerns about whether its AI systems were trained on user-generated content without permission.
Adobe clarified its position but faced a significant backlash from the artistic community.
Procreate’s rejection of generative AI reflects a broader sentiment within the art world that values the integrity of human creativity over technological shortcuts.
While generative AI can produce content with less effort, critics argue that its widespread use could erode the unique, personal touch of human-created art.
Generative AI’s role in the creative industry
The debate over generative AI’s place in creative industries continues to evolve. As artists express a clear preference for maintaining human-driven creativity, businesses may need to reassess their strategies to align with these values.
The initial enthusiasm for generative AI among tech companies is facing scrutiny as the art community advocates for preserving the human element in creativity.
James Cuda remains optimistic about Procreate’s future, asserting that their commitment to supporting human creativity is the right path.
He acknowledges that taking such a stance is challenging but believes it aligns with the broader values of the artistic community.
While Procreate’s move sets the company apart as a champion of human creativity, it also raises concerns about its long-term viability in an industry increasingly dominated by AI technologies.
For Procreate to succeed, it must find ways to balance its commitment to human artistry with the financial realities of running a tech business.
As the landscape of digital art and technology continues to evolve, Procreate’s stance may inspire other companies to reconsider their approach to AI. The company’s ability to navigate these changes while staying true to its core values will be crucial in determining its future success.
The post iPad design app Procreate declares it will never use generative AI: Can the company survive? appeared first on Invezz
0
0
Manage all your crypto, NFT and DeFi from one placeSecurely connect the portfolio you’re using to start.
