Bitcoin be zero before 2030s! forked to multiple quantum-resistant chains, lead to collapse of consensus, as per White House NSM10 have called whole-of-state for migration to PQC quantum secure. but all digital signature algos, even in future 20 years, are bigger sizes in either pubkey or signature
0
0
![]() | 1, That WhiteHouse NSM-10 executively ordering whole-of-govt to migrate to quantum resistant cryptography will drive whole-of-bitcoin to do so, is it a must-to-do currently urgent BIP to do! WhiteHouse have ordered whole-of-state to migrate to quantum-resistant cryptography nowadays: it's obviously a must-to-do for bitcoin migration! 2, Can bitcoin quite easily migrate to quantum-resistant? Andreas Antonoplous said on this video at 3'22", “bitcoin..can migrate quite easily to another algorithm,it's not really as big of a threat as people think it's", is totally different with whatPieter Wuille have said: All practical (potentially) PQ schemes have massive keys or signatures, so it's not a free upgrade in any case. 3, Actually, there're only 3 types of quantum resistant digital signature algorithms even in future 20 years around. it imply to bitcoin have to be forked into multiple chains. A. to use any one of lattice, hash-based signature, or multivariate, which is too big in signature size and/or public key, those future-forked bitcoins will have to be shift to PoS firstly, and then implement hash-based. as PoS consensus need few requirements in signature size and public key one. B. to use lattice, "Anyone considering lattice-based post-quantum cryptography should see this warning chart" it imply lattice probably get trouble in consensus. Fr above, we believe bitcoin will be zero very soon as such future-forked bitcoin chains by using quantum-resistant algos above will lead bitcoin users to parts and parts, it probably cause the collapse of consensus! Thoughts? [link] [comments] |
0
0
Securely connect the portfolio you’re using to start.