A razor for your arguments, courtesy of BSV

I think it is the case that many people have been indoctrinated against Bitcoin cash by reading censored forums or listening to influencers that get their information from said forums. As such, the way they tend to think about BCH is very similar to how many people here think about BSV:

That it is a scam coin created by malicious actors for their financial gain, ego, and general self interests, who somehow got gullible people to follow them.

This presents in my opinion a great opportunity for enhancing our arguments when talking to people who have been getting such false information about bitcoin cash. All we have to do is this: Replace BCH with BSV in our argumentation and ask ourselves: If a BSV supporter told that exact argument to me, would it make me research some more, or would I straight out dismiss it?

In the first case, we will know that we have a good argument, because the first win in a dialectic process is not to necessarily convince the other party, but to get them to question their prior beliefs and want to do more research on their own. In the second case, our argument probably is somewhat weak, or at the very least incomplete and needs re-formulating.

Just my two cents for your consideration.