Build with CoinStats’ all-in-one API. Learn more

EnglishDeutsch한국어日本語EspañolFrançaisՀայերենNederlandsРусскийItalianoPortuguêsTürkçe投资组合跟踪工具加密货币定价Crypto API集成新闻赚取博客NFT小工具DeFi投资组合跟踪器加密货币游戏24小时报告新闻资料包API文档
CoinStats

GLQ circulating supply discrepancy..which figure should be used for market cap?

看涨:

0

看跌:

0

I'm looking into GraphLinq (GLQ) and I'm finding conflicting supply figures across different data sources.

Some sources still reference the original 500M GLQ ERC-20 supply, while other aggregators/exchanges appear to show higher total-supply figures following the launch of the native GraphLinq chain.

What I'm mainly trying to understand from a market valuation perspective is:

What is the actual circulating supply of GLQ today?

What is the correct total/max supply after accounting for the native chain?

Are native-chain block rewards creating additional GLQ beyond the original 500M?

If so, what is the current net inflation rate after fee burns?

Which supply figure should realistically be used when calculating GLQ's market cap and fully diluted valuation?

I'm not looking for price predictions or trying to promote the project. I'm specifically interested in getting the tokenomics/supply side right because the difference between ~340M circulating, 500M total, ~650M total and potentially higher figures obviously makes a substantial difference when valuing the asset.

If anyone has tracked the native chain or knows of an authoritative explorer/source for minted vs. burned GLQ, I'd appreciate it.

submitted by /u/Acrobatic-Eye-5591
[link] [comments]
看涨:

0

看跌:

0

从同一位置管理所有加密资产、NFT 和 DeFi 资产

安全地关联您正在使用的投资组合,以开始交易。