Build with CoinStats’ all-in-one API. Learn more

EnglishDeutsch日本語中文EspañolFrançaisՀայերենNederlandsРусскийItalianoPortuguêsTürkçe포트폴리오 추적기암호화폐가격Crypto API통합뉴스RWA 시장획득블로그NFT위젯DeFi 포트폴리오 추적기파생상품ETF Flows크립토 게이밍24시간 보고서홍보 자료API 문서

GLQ circulating supply discrepancy..which figure should be used for market cap?

상승세:

0

하락세:

0

I'm looking into GraphLinq (GLQ) and I'm finding conflicting supply figures across different data sources.

Some sources still reference the original 500M GLQ ERC-20 supply, while other aggregators/exchanges appear to show higher total-supply figures following the launch of the native GraphLinq chain.

What I'm mainly trying to understand from a market valuation perspective is:

What is the actual circulating supply of GLQ today?

What is the correct total/max supply after accounting for the native chain?

Are native-chain block rewards creating additional GLQ beyond the original 500M?

If so, what is the current net inflation rate after fee burns?

Which supply figure should realistically be used when calculating GLQ's market cap and fully diluted valuation?

I'm not looking for price predictions or trying to promote the project. I'm specifically interested in getting the tokenomics/supply side right because the difference between ~340M circulating, 500M total, ~650M total and potentially higher figures obviously makes a substantial difference when valuing the asset.

If anyone has tracked the native chain or knows of an authoritative explorer/source for minted vs. burned GLQ, I'd appreciate it.

submitted by /u/Acrobatic-Eye-5591
[link] [comments]
상승세:

0

하락세:

0

한 곳에서 모든 암호화폐, NFT 및 DeFi 를 관리하세요

시작하는 데 사용하는 포트폴리오를 안전하게 연결하세요.